Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup

The future of research dissemination: Innovation in publishing formats

10.38105/spr.ex3016cqt0

Published onAug 27, 2024
The future of research dissemination: Innovation in publishing formats
·

Edited by: AUSTIN IGLESIAS SARAGIH 1 AND LAURA SHUPP2

Peer-reviewed scientific journals have been used in formal research communication for decades, but the quality, accessibility, timeliness, clarity, and fairness of articles resulting from the currently dominant publishing model have been questioned. Many novel online publishing strategies have emerged to address gaps in the traditional publishing model. Strategies that reduce or eliminate pre-publication peer review, such as preprints, reduce the cost and time required to publish, thus enhancing accessibility and accelerating science. Other modalities such as multimedia journals provide access to and credit for new types of academic contributions, as well as findings that never result in traditional publications. While scientific grant-funding agencies have begun to embrace preprints and data repositories, most of these organizations have not yet addressed other innovative publishing modalities. Funding for publishing infrastructure development, support for preprints, and changes to grant evaluation guidelines targeted towards rewarding nontraditional publishing could facilitate more widespread adoption of a variety of publishing strategies.

Highlights

  1. Digitalization has given rise to new formats of scholarly communication that have the potential to rectify challenges in traditional scientific publishing.

  2. Despite recent changes in grant funding policies to promote open-access publishing and data sharing, assessment of academic merit in the grant review process currently still relies heavily on publication in traditional peer-reviewed journals.

  3. Strategies to increase the adaptation of alternative publishing modalities include the following: federal funding for research infrastructure, adjustments to grant-funding policies, and increased support for preprints and pre-publication peer review.

READ HERE:


This MIT Science Policy Review article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/.

Comments
0
comment
No comments here
Why not start the discussion?